Showing posts with label childfree. Show all posts
Showing posts with label childfree. Show all posts

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Mother's Day on Steroids: A Contrarian View


Over the past couple of years it’s been clear to me that holidays have become of monumental importance in the American culture. Christmas—December 25—is an entire season. When I was a kid, talk of Christmas began a week or two before the big day.  Not anymore.  A few years ago, stores began to trot out Christmas decorations on November 1, as soon as the Halloween pumpkins were put away. Last year, though, I noticed a number of stores selling Christmas wreaths right alongside Halloween masks. The Christmas season now begins in October.


And the ads to remind you to buy something, do something—usually something expensive—for Valentine’s Day begin right after New Year’s Day.  Oh, the pressure.



And now here comes Mother’s Day. Mother’s Day, a national holiday since 1914, when President Woodrow Wilson declared it so, has recently become MOTHER’S DAY!!! It, too, is superlative; it is not to be ignored. The ads started a couple of months ago. Mother’s Day is bigger than Christmas and Valentine’s Day in some ways (Number 1 being the guilt if you don’t do something spectacular to honor it).    



On this one I’m sort of on the outside looking in. I’m (by choice) not a mother, and I don’t have one (not my choice) . . . so I’m free to sort of watch from afar and ponder lightly what it all means. And interestingly, it seems that as the number of childfree-by-choice women grows, the importance of being a mother has taken on colossal status.


For most of civilization, a woman’s becoming a mother was a given. If her body could reproduce, she did . . . really whether she wanted to or not. Better birth control changed this somewhat. Women could choose when to be a mother, but most still rarely considered if they should.


But now, more and more, becoming a mother—or not—is beginning to be recognized as a choice. There are far more women in their 40s without children now than there were in past decades. In 1976, just 10 percent of all women ages 40 to 44 had no children. That percentage had doubled by 2010.


Yet as it becomes more apparent that, as wonderful as motherhood can be, being a mother is no panacea, and we as a society seem to have, collectively, decided that we must make motherhood seem like The. Best. Thing. Ever. I wish everybody could just relax.




On the one hand, some researchers are declaring that having kids is often unsatisfying—indeed, can mar one’s happiness.
  • From a 2009 column by The New York Times‘s Maureen Dowd:  “‘Across the happiness data, the one thing in life that will make you less happy is having children,’ said Betsey Stevenson, an assistant professor at Wharton who co-wrote a paper called ‘The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness.’ It’s true whether you’re wealthy or poor, if you have kids late or kids early. Yet I know very few people who would tell me they wish they hadn’t had kids or who would tell me they feel their kids were the destroyer of their happiness.”
  • From a 2010 New York magazine article by Jennifer Senior, “All Joy and No Fun: Why Parents Hate Parenting” . . . well, the title really says it all.

And yet we are celebrating motherhood and Mother’s Day like never before. The amount consumers spend to celebrate the day continues to rise. According to the National Retail Federation’s 2012 poll, the average consumer is expected to spend $152 on Mother’s Day gifts, up from $140 last year.
And just the other day, a New York Times article, “The Baby Bump,” discusses how having a baby improves the “career” (and bank account) of countless celebrities.


Last year, I wrote a blog post about how so many people—strangers and other people I passed on the street— wished me Happy Mother’s Day. I thought this was pretty amusing; maybe I just look like I’m a mother.


And last year, people on Facebook were encouraged to “show their love” for their moms by posting a picture of her (because, what, if you don’t make a public declaration it isn’t true?). I toyed with the idea of posting my mom’s picture, then decided against it. I’m picky about which social media bandwagons I jump on, and this one just seemed, well, kinda forced to me.


Every one of the morning news shows and daytime talk shows, every single day, has a segment (or three) on all kinds of people proclaiming, repeatedly, their love, love, love for their mothers on national TV. The more excessive, the better. In the lead-up to Mother’s Day, every mother is perfect. Nobody has a shaky relationship with her mom; everyone has been blessed with a paragon of virtue and goodness.


Multiply the pressure of Valentine’s Day by, oh, 10,000. Honestly, I think all this hoopla sorta takes some of the fun out of Mother’s Day, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t it be nice if the way we celebrate this day were more organic, more personal, less full of pressure? Of course, this is easy for me to say. Having neither a child nor a mother, I can muse about this in the abstract.


Happy Mother’s Day, everybody. Really.




NOTE: The Spinsterlicious Life: 20 Life Lessons for Living Happily Single and Childfree-- has been published and is available here and  hereand on Amazon.




 And if you like "Spinsterlicious" and want to be notified of new posts, please subscribe "Via Email" in the box on the right. You'll receive an email when there's a new blog post. Or "Like" Spinsterlicious on Facebook. Just click the button at the top of this page. Or "Follow Me" on Twitter (button on the right). Whatever you do, don't miss a Spinsterlicious update! 

Monday, January 9, 2012

"Professional Aunts"?? Another Club I Can't Belong To.



A married friend of mine sent me this article about a new marketing demographic called PANKs - Professional Aunts, No Kids.  PANKs are single women without kids who spend lots of time with and money on (more importantly) other people's kids.  They shower love, attention, and gifts on the kids of their family and friends…and then send them home.  The send-them-home part is mine.  I added that because I'm not sure I entirely get it, so I'm trying to make it more palatable.


Oh, I get it intellectually.  I have a few single friends who are PANKs.  Part of me wants to be more like them.  Actually, I don't want to be more like them…I just wish I wanted to.  They love other people's kids.  And they don't just love them, they nurture them, groom them, hang out with them.

I'll call these PANKs friends to get together for something fun and they can't because they're taking somebody's kids to the movies, out to lunch, having them over for the weekend...or some other questionable use of their time.  It does seem to bring them a lot of joy.

And my Professional Auntie friends aren't alone.  There are lots of actual and would-be PANKs out there.  According to a 2010 study by the Pew Institute,  one-in-five American women now ends her childbearing years without having borne a child, compared with one-in-ten in the 1970s.  So smart marketers have determined that these women are ripe for being enticed to buy products and services for their nieces and nephews, the real ones and the ones in their hearts.

Please don't misunderstand me.  I love my friends' kids, too.  I'm always happy to see them and love chatting with them to hear what they've been up to, and learning some newfangled something from them that only kids understand...but that's pretty much where it ends.  I've always known I didn't want kids of my own but I used to think I'd be the kind of cool auntie (a PANK) that would have other people's kids over for pajama parties on the weekend, expose them to cultural events, and just sort of hang out with them and talk about things they didn't want to discuss with their parents.  It turns out I am not that person.

What I finally came to realize is that the same reason I didn't want my own kids is the  reason I don't want to spend too much time with other people's kids.

Hooray for all the PANKs out there.  Are you one?   Or are you more sane, like me!  :-o




NOTE: Don't forget to visit The Spinsterlicious Life Shop. They make a statement... and a great gift! 




 And if you like "Spinsterlicious" and want to be notified of new posts, please subscribe "Via Email" in the box on the right. You'll receive an email when there's a new blog post. Or "Like" Spinsterlicious on Facebook. Just click the button at the top of this page. Or "Follow Me" on Twitter (button on the right). Whatever you do, don't miss a Spinsterlicious update!

Friday, October 28, 2011

Child-free...or Just Free? (An Oldie-But-Goodie)

I am a "woman of a certain age".  (Love that expression; it says everything...and not much at all).  Never married, no kids.  Spinsterlicious.  And I've got a pretty fantastic life.  I'm pretty good at dating and I have a nice career running my own consumer research and strategy company that has brought me a vacation home, an active social life, and travels around the world.

A lot of people still wonder, though, how a "fantastic life" could be possible since I haven't done what every woman is not only supposed to do, but is apparently driven to do: marry and give birth.  What's more, I've done this by choice.  I'm not anti-husband nor anti-child, but I don't think they're for everyone (really, how could anything be for everyone?), and I never felt they were for me.

For what it's worth, I'm not the only one actively choosing not to have children.  Thirty years ago, only 20% of women in their early 40s had no children; according to the US Census, that number has now doubled.

People assume that if I'm not married it must be because I couldn't pull it off.  (Not true.)  But not wanting kids?  There's clearly something wrong with me.  I mean, why was I given a uterus if I wasn't going to use it?  Just saying I'm not a mother, by choice, is a really good way to slow down a conversation in polite company.  I don't usually offer the "by choice" part, though, because it really shouldn't matter.  (Well, I don't offer it unless someone comments in a way I find annoying, which is usually more of a tone thing.)

Some people --usually women-- seem to take offense at my chosen child-free existence.  It's one thing if I couldn't have them ("poor thing"), but to not want them?  It's as if I'm challenging their decision to have them.  I'm not.  I don't really care about their decision.  (Okay, sometimes I am curious).  Every now and then I come across people who have kids but don't seem to enjoy it, and I do find myself wondering why they bothered.  Maybe they should have given it more thought.

Anyway, without further ado, I thought I'd share 14 of the 67 reasons why not having kids has worked so well for me:


  • My Yorkie, Danny, whose haircuts cost more than mine, is really about all the additional responsibility I can handle.  When I leave the house at a moment's notice and stay gone all day without walking him, I call Mike-the-dogwalker and he takes care of it.  People might frown if I treated my kid that way too many times.

  • I can watch all kinds of inappropriate TV shows whenever I feel like it, without worrying about who I'm emotionally scarring (other than myself).

  • I like to cuss.  The F-word and its derivatives are some of my favorite words.  It's not cute when kids do it, though.  This way, I don't have to answer for my duplicity.

  • Similarly, I can download the "explicit" version of songs from iTunes and don't have to censor when I play them.

  • If I have too much to drink, it's okay.

  • I can laze around the house all Saturday morning with the newspaper, coffee, and the remote control.  No soccer games to go to.

  • When I come home exhausted from work or wherever, nobody's clamoring at me and wondering what's for dinner.  (Okay, sometimes the dog is.)

  • I can give my friends on the telephone my undivided attention.  I'm not ("stop it, Billy") constantly interrupting my conversation ("no, I don't know where it is") to talk to others ("tie your shoes") on my end.

  • I like to walk around the house naked.

  • I am able to hold a conversation without peppering it with constant references to my kids.

  • Travel is one of my passions.  I work hard... so I can fund my next trip.  I've traveled throughout the U.S. to major cities and small towns, and around the world.  I want to go everywhere, and I pretty much can, because my time and my money are my own.  I spend my dollars however I want without having to consider if it could be better spent on my child's braces.

  • Firm-ish boobs.  No stretch marks.

  • I can date whoever I want without worrying about his effect on my kids.  If I had kids, I would have to make more responsible choices in the men I bring home.

  • In 1998, I quit my job because I decided I wanted to work for myself.  (Actually, I didn't want to work at all, but I couldn't quite figure out how to make that happen).  I thought about it seriously for only a couple of weeks.  Didn't matter; I was tired of being expected to show up at work every day at 9a.  Suppose I didn't feel like starting work until 11:30a?  Clearly the answer was to make my own hours.  And so I did. Not having a business plan or client might have been a tad irresponsible if I'd had to consider somebody else's welfare other than my own.
I have to admit, though, I do miss being able to use my kids as an excuse to get out of stuff I don't feel like doing.  ("Sorry, Annie's got a fever/recital/homework").

Other than that, though, I'm good.  Anybody else want to share?



NOTE: If you like "Spinsterlicious" and want to be notified of new posts, please subscribe "Via Email" in the box on the right. You'll receive an email when there's a new blog post.   Or "Like" Spinsterlicious on Facebook. Just click the button at the top of this page.   Or "Follow Me" on Twitter (button on the right).   Whatever you do, don't miss a Spinsterlicious update!   

Oh yeah.  And don't forget to visit  The Spinsterlicious Life SHOP!

Monday, November 8, 2010

Uh-Oh. I Might Be a Hypocrite

About a month ago, a woman I used to work with wanted to introduce me to her friend, a "nice guy who's really fun", according to her.  He did sound good.  Apparently handsome, educated in "good schools" (for whatever that's worth), gainfully employed, great sense of humor, nice to his mother.  Sounded like a real gem.  I said "sure".  I'm usually game to go out with somebody fun...and you never know, it could lead to something more.  Except it wouldn't.  Here's why it wouldn't: Dude was 52 and had never been married. (Gasp).  I put the brakes on right there.  I wasn't going out with him.  Nope.  (I know.  I should be ashamed of myself).

But let me explain.  When I meet a grown woman who has never been married and has no kids, I don't think anything.  Those are date points without a distinction.  Not true with a guy, though.  A bright red flag goes up when that same description is tied to a man.  I wanna know what's wrong with him.  Seriously.  Something must be. I know it's not fair.  But I still think it.  I can't quite put it into words that I can defend, but I still think it.

So I told her "no thanks".  When I told her why, of course she thought I was nuts.  I don't care.  It wouldn't work.  At the very least, one of us needs to have some sense of how to be in a long-term committed relationship and it's not me...so the onus is on him.  Sorry.

So, I'm a hypocrite.  Single, chldfree women are fine; single, childfree men are weird.  Tell me I'm not the only one who feels that way.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Because You Can't Have a Kid-Walker

Reason #67 why being Spinsterlicious is so cool.   It was a hot Saturday after a very long week.  I was at home, sprawled on the couch, New York Times on my lap, tv remote control in my hand, and Danny-the-world’s-cutest-dog by my side.  My plan was to stay like that for most of the day.  It was perfect; nobody could bother me for anything. 

 

Around 11a, the phone rang.  I almost didn’t answer, but it was a number I didn’t recognize and my curiosity got the best of me.  A couple of friends were visiting from out of town and were in my neighborhood.    A few minutes later, we were having sangria at a restaurant down the street.  Just like that.  The sangria was supposed to be it because I had napping to do, a newspaper to read, and DVR’d shows to catch up on.  Somehow, though, after we left the sangria place we ended up in Battery Park City having a leisurely lunch at an outdoor restaurant.   It was really hot and I was glad I’d left the A/C on at home for Danny.


After lunch, they convinced me to take a ride upstate to Hudson, NY to pop in on another friend who was renting a summer house up there.    This was turning out to be a spectacular day: totally unplanned and a lot of fun.    By now, many hours had passed since I dashed out of the house for my adventure.  I called Mike, the guy who walks Danny during the week while I’m at work.  “Would you mind walking Danny for me?  I’m going to be out a lot longer than I expected”.   He said “yes”.    When I got home that night, I was exhausted and happy.  Danny was fine, chilling on the couch; we were happy to see each other.  It was a great day, completely spontaneous, and very fun.


And you know what? That glorious day could never have happened that way if Danny was my child instead of my dog.  Well, I guess it could have, but someone might have reported me to the authorities…because you can leave the dog alone for hours while you go out on a moment’s notice, but people get upset if you do that to your kid.   Childfree, baby.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Spinsterlicious? Yep

 The Spinsterlicious Life; my musings about the realities and joys of being single, child-free, and not mad about it.   Here’s how this whole thing  got started.  I ran into a woman I knew from years ago at a party and before I could answer “How are you doing”, she asked me “Are you married, yet”?   I’m asked this a lot and I feel I always have to have a quip ready: one that seems lighthearted but hopefully also conveys that I think it’s a bizarre question.  There’s nothing wrong with asking if I’m married, but the “yet” implies that this is something I must do. 

But I never really thought so. 

I am a heterosexual woman, I live in New York City,  I love dating…and I date a lot.   I have an awesome life:   a successful career as the owner of a marketing consultancy --Golden Door Consulting--  with a great income that allows me to afford a second home in the Hamptons, an active social life, and vacations around the world.  I have great relationships with my family and a fabulous circle of good friends.  I support charitable organizations with my money and time, and adore my 11-year-old Yorkie, Danny.   Despite all this goodness, there are many who look at my statistics and feel sorry for me.

What struck me about that recent encounter is that the “Are you married, yet” chick is going through her third divorce.  And she’s looking at me all crazy. 

Marriage and kids were never really in my plans.  Not everybody gets that., though.  Admitting this in a social setting can really slow down a conversation.  Most women want a husband and children so there’s obviously something wrong with the woman who doesn’t...right? 

Did you know that the number of unmarried adults in the US rose from 28% in 1970  -to- 47% in 2010?   That’s right…almost half of U.S. adults are single.  And if we focus on the Never Married, that description fits 23% of white women in the U.S. in 2009, and 45% of black women. That's a lot of people; so it's really not that uncommon.

Even more interesting (to me, anyway), is that more women than ever are choosing not to have children.  Thirty years ago, only 20% of women in their early 40s had no children; that number has now doubled.  It's interesting because it seems there's the belief that if you have a uterus, you should use it. but more and more women have been saying “not really”.

Obviously, I am not the only Spinster out there.  I know --and I know you know-- lots of fabulous women who are not wives or mothers.  In fact, there’s a whole world of similarly-situated women out there who just want to be acknowledged as the  smart, attractive, fascnating people they are.

This blog is for them, and any grown woman who hasn’t married or procreated…maybe for the time being, maybe forever AND the people who look askance at her.  

Everybody needs to lighten up. 

Being single without children is not the norm – yet— but there’s a lot that’s really good about being single, free, and unencumbered. 

So, I'll be blogging about that...and all kinds of other things that might cross my mind.  I'm hoping you'll join me in the conversation: your thoughts, your reactions, your own experiences. 

Postscript: Check out Ad Age's article on this very topic:  http://adage.com/article?article_id=146376



[I didn't make those numbers up:  Statistics Source: The US Census]